Delftsman

Anti-Military Hatemongers, Part Deux

Back on February 19, I wrote a post about a truly hate filled site that tries to denigrate the men and women of the United States military in ways that should bring a RCOB moment to anyone that truly loves this country. I spoke my piece and urged everyone to protest the supporters of this site as the hatemongers that they are.

Then while checking my e-mail today, I saw that a reader named Milo had commented on that post. Here's what Milo had to say:

The information at http://www.forsakethetroops.info/ is information we should know. Admitedly the writer is angry and upset but what can people expect when the election is stolen from them to proceed with an illegal war.

Posted by milo at April 26, 2005 07:24 PM

I debated whether or not to let the link stand, as I didn't want to give these idiotic hatemongers any traffic, but then I realized that, yes, I DO want as many of my readers to see the tripe that is being spewed there, and hopefully, protest it vehemently for the Anti-American garbage it is. Mikey "the" crook is screaming for attention again.

As I wrote in my first post:

"...Luckily, my nephew over at the Slaughterhouse could and did write a reasoned post. Go there, read what he wrote and follow your own consciounce(sic). I agree wholeheartedly with Slaglerock.
There are times when free speech just becomes an expression of unreasoned hate, and should be exposed to the world to see, and to provoke a response against it. The ONLY difference between he and I is that I WILL call the site owners scumbags, for that term describes them perfectly."

The time has come again to defend what we belive in, and defend the defenders as well.

And Milo? the election is over, your side lost, get over it. All the fevered imaginings of Neo-con plots that your ilk have tried to put up have been debunked time and again, and it's not worth my effort to do it yet again; the fact is that in a Republic, sometimes your side loses, DEAL WITH IT.

As far as Iraq being an "illegal war"; thats just Progressive tripe. There is plenty of international law to back it up, including the UN's own resolutions. That the UN didn't have the balls to back up their threat, doesn't make the operation illegal. In fact, it could be argued that Operation Sandbox ll™ is merely a continuation of our first altercation. We gave Saddam 12 years to comply with the terms of the cease fire of that operation, and he chose not to, and in the light of the events of 9/11, it was incumbant upon us to not allow any furthur delay against our national security interests.

update: On the directory page of this piece of trash site, they have the following notice concerning their comment section:

"Because of the ignorant actions of a few, who can't express their opinions without obscenity, insults, and disrespect, the message board requires that you register to read or post. Also, the guestbook is now moderated. Amazingly, no one is trying to voice their opinion. It's surprising what happens when anonymity is taken away. Peoples' balls fall off. There's free speech, folks, but only to a limit, and it has been abused..we have been abused. Disagree with us, fine, but do it with respect and couth."

I posted an e-mail, using my name and addy, disagreeing with their point of view, with no invective, but a few pithy observations and this was the response I received:

"FTT/CATT"
To: "Bert Meyer"
Subject: Re: FTT E-mail
Date: Tue, 26 Apr 2005 18:39:20 -0400

Would that friend be your butt buddy, Ernie?

Go back to Sesame Street...Bert!

Fucking military loving puke.

Notice that the site owner can't be bothered to comply with what he wishes his respondant's to do.... I guess this shows the outcome of "self-esteem" based education. Mikey never learned that respect isn't given, it's earned.
I sincerly hope that his parents tire of his failure to pull his own weight and kick him out of their basement soon. The shock of attempting to live in the real world just may do Mikey some good.

Posted by Delftsman3 at April 26, 2005 08:54 PM