An oldie but a goodie....
After their 11th child, an Alabama couple decided that was enough, as they could not afford a larger bed.
So the husband went to his doctor and told him that he and his cousin didn't want to have any more children.
The doctor told him that there was a procedure called a vasectomy that could fix the problem but that it was expensive. "A less costly alternative," said the doctor, "is to go home, get a cherry bomb, (fireworks are legal in Alabama) light it, put it in a beer can, then hold
the can up to your ear and count to 10.."
The Alabamian said to the doctor, "I may not be the smartest tool in the shed, but I don't see how putting a cherry bomb in a beer can next to my ear is going to help me."
"Trust me," said the doctor.
So the man went home, lit a cherry bomb and put it in a beer can. He held the can up to his ear and began to count!
"1"
"2"
"3"
"4"
"5"
At which point he paused, placed the beer can between his legs and continued counting on his other hand.
This procedure also works in Tennessee , Kentucky , Louisiana , Arkansas , Mississippi , Missouri , West Virginia and Washington DC .....
I've learned newer and more effective things via your website Delftsman: THE REDNECK VASECTOMY. One other thing I'd prefer to say is the fact newer personal computer os's often allow more memory to be played with, but they also demand more memory space simply to work. If someone's computer could not handle more memory plus the newest application requires that memory space increase, it might be the time to buy a new PC.
Posted by: meg43tr44gi joe at October 1, 2011 03:14 PMI certainly agree with the sentiment!
Posted by: Jefferson Brauner at October 3, 2011 04:41 PMAfter watching CBS's Sixty Minutes program I conclude Lance is doing the perp walk soon.
Posted by: Michele Flirt at October 4, 2011 10:54 AMSince watching the episode of 60 Minutes you have to be sure Armstrong is caught.
Posted by: Francine Kleespies at October 4, 2011 05:02 PMLovely piece, kudos to you for making the effort to write it down
Posted by: Sherrill Parcel at October 4, 2011 07:47 PMWonderful post however I was wanting to know if you could write a litte more on this subject? I'd be very grateful if you could elaborate a little bit further. Appreciate it!
Posted by: Missy Bendit at October 5, 2011 12:37 AMEnjoyable article, I genuinely benefited from glossing over it, keep doing all the hard thoughts.
Posted by: Phyllis Tostado at October 5, 2011 09:02 AMGreat ideas, props to you for having the initiave to come up with it
Posted by: Clemencia Vanetta at October 5, 2011 11:01 AMI am over the moon about it and I think that this wedding is one of the best things to happen of the 2000s. Congratulations to the happy couple and any one that doesn't agree is a republican.
Posted by: Anissa Ulberg at October 5, 2011 02:11 PMGiven CBS's episode of 60 Minutes one can't help but bet Armstrong is kaput.
Posted by: Candance Humston at October 5, 2011 06:52 PMFun post, I surprisingly enjoyed reading it, keep doing the good work.
Posted by: Julieta Manatt at October 6, 2011 05:36 AMMany thanks for the entry, I can't say I agree exactly with it but I agree with it on the most part and I wholeheartedly applaud your effort in putting it so clearly.
Posted by: Johnny Leite at October 6, 2011 07:41 PMThanks for today's entry, I can't say I agree exactly with it but I agree with it on the most part and I definitely applaud your effort in putting it so clearly.
Posted by: Deadra Copstead at October 6, 2011 09:46 PMThanks for your post, seriously, can you become a topic contributor for wikipedia because the current pages in there for our interest is frankly dross. I don't agree exactly with it but I agree with it on the most part and I certainly applaud your effort in putting it so succinctly.
Posted by: Lia Irick at October 6, 2011 11:48 PMEnjoyable page, I surprisingly had a good time studying it, keep doing all the hard work.
Posted by: Alise Lanphear at October 7, 2011 01:52 AMThank you for the post, I don't agree exactly with it but I agree with it on the most part and I certainly applaud your effort in putting it so clearly.
Posted by: Bertie Boemer at October 7, 2011 03:57 AMFantastic article, I surprisingly enjoyed glossing over it, keep doing all the hard efforts.
Posted by: Rivka Schmalz at October 7, 2011 09:18 AMUseful piece of writing,I reckon you could have emphatically constructed an internet site I have to read repeatedly. Many thanks.
Posted by: Kristie Candelaria at October 7, 2011 12:16 PMAfter watching the Sixty Minutes program I would be sure Lance is kaput.
Posted by: Jerica Shover at October 7, 2011 06:21 PMIn light of the 60 Minutes Program one can't help but think Armstrong is going to struggle.
Posted by: Leonia Schleisman at October 8, 2011 03:43 PMThank you for the entry, I don't quite agree exactly with it but I agree with it on the most part and I certainly applaud your effort in putting it so ably.
Posted by: Janina Fazzinga at October 8, 2011 06:09 PMGreat post, I actually benefited from reading it, keep doing all the hard efforts.
Posted by: Chiquita Boocock at October 8, 2011 10:52 PMFantastic ideas, kudos to you for taking the time to think of it
Posted by: Chelsey Dunkelberger at October 9, 2011 10:53 AMGiven CBS's 60 minutes episode you have to think Armstrong is doing the perp walk soon.
Posted by: Samella Lanphear at October 10, 2011 01:25 PMGracias for this post, honestly, can you sign up as a author for wikipedia because the current stuff hosted there for our hobby is frankly garbage. I don't agree completely with it but I agree with it on the most part and I definitely applaud your effort in putting it so clearly.
Posted by: Shoshana Six at October 10, 2011 07:06 PMGood message,It looks like you have indeed assembled an internet site I must read weekly. Thanks.
Posted by: Joaquina Dupaty at October 12, 2011 04:57 AMI certainly respect your views.
Posted by: Arie Fenoff at October 13, 2011 05:07 AM.edu links are actually a lot more efficient power back links.These kind of back-links are usually extremely looked by a lot of internet marketers around the globe because it is getting a lot more recognition and energy than other normal back links.Edu domains are generally regarded highly by search engines like yahoo and backlinks coming from .edu domains are generally several times more useful than regular ones.However precisely what about Edu's? No person may buy edu domains apart from of educational institutions. And that's precisely why they have the most important faith from Google and yahoo.Yahoo and google thinks that EDU site will never link to an internet site using low-informational articles or content that is not really worth Google's consideration. Maybe somebody will point out that anyone can certainly get edu backlinks by registering edu website, however that is far from the truth. Because nobody can buy edu website other than of educational institutions.To be certain you may easily try and sign-up edu site. Obtain edu backlinks from www.buy-edu-backlinks.info with minimal costs.
Posted by: buy backlinks at October 14, 2011 11:53 AMMany thanks for your post, I don't quite agree exactly with it but I agree with it on the most part and I certainly applaud your effort in putting it so ably.
Posted by: Cassi Maire at October 14, 2011 11:05 PMGreat feature, I actually enjoyed reading it, keep doing the hard work.
Posted by: Lindsay Wigg at October 18, 2011 12:27 AMGreat post, thanks for showing the initiative to write it down
Posted by: Drew Eisenhaver at October 18, 2011 03:15 AM.edu links are actually a lot more effective authority one way links. These types of back-links tend to be extremely explored by numerous site owners all over the world since it is having more authority and power compared to other frequent inbound links. Edu internet domain names tend to be regarded remarkably by yahoo and google as well as inbound links coming from .edu domains are generally several times more beneficial compared to normal types.However precisely what about Edu's? No person can buy edu domain names other than of academic organizations. And that is exactly why they get the most important trust from Yahoo.Search engines believes that EDU web site will not ever link to a niche site using low-informational content material or even content material this is not truly worth Google's interest. Perhaps someone will certainly state that any person will be able to obtain edu backlinks simply by signing up edu website, however that is not the case. Because no person can buy edu website except of educational facilities.To be sure you can try and apply for edu site.
Posted by: Buy Edu Backlinks at October 19, 2011 03:26 AMEver since CBS's 60 Minutes Program one can't help but think Lance is done for.
Posted by: Cherise Kokesh at October 22, 2011 02:38 PMI must say, as a lot as I enjoyed reading what you had to say, I couldnt help but lose interest after a while. Its as if you had a fantastic grasp around the topic matter, but you forgot to include your readers. Perhaps you should think about this from more than one angle. Or maybe you shouldnt generalise so much. Its better if you think about what others may have to say instead of just going for a gut reaction to the subject. Think about adjusting your very own believed process and giving others who may read this the benefit of the doubt.
Posted by: acne makeup best at November 8, 2011 12:18 AMI am always sating hotels and the difference in quality and customer service still amazes me. I have done a lot of travelling through business and pleasure and the difference to me between a nice stay and a great stay is welcoming staff. There is nothing worse than checking into a hotel to find that the staff can't even really be bothered to servce you and show you too your room. I have also stayed at hotels where items of my personal belongings have gone missing after the maids have gone through the place.
Posted by: play puzzle bobble at November 11, 2011 02:53 PMLooking at Delftsman: THE REDNECK VASECTOMY I made the decision to post a good comment for author. Maintain the good projects, I want to see soon similar articles. In addition your blog loads up very fast!
Posted by: valeters motor trade insurance at November 17, 2011 10:49 AMLooking at Delftsman: THE REDNECK VASECTOMY I decided to post a good comment for you. Maintain the excellent projects, I hope to study shortly similar blog posts. Also your site loads up fast!
Posted by: teosyal lip augmentation at November 17, 2011 02:37 PMIf you are looking for a professional escort service be sure to check out our site.
Posted by: buy backlinks at November 22, 2011 02:14 AMThanks for the info mate
Posted by: My blog at November 24, 2011 11:46 PMLol great post mate just added you on twitter ;)
Posted by: sleep cycles at December 1, 2011 01:03 AMIt is good post, but I don't see everything completely clear, specifically for someone not involved in that topic. Anyway very interesting to me.
Posted by: Simone Degiacomo at December 16, 2011 11:00 PMGood posting in Delftsman: THE REDNECK VASECTOMY. I loved reading this article. If you like, check out my website.
Posted by: Custom Logo Design at January 2, 2012 01:31 PMI just added this web site to my feed reader, excellent stuff. Cannot get enough!
Posted by: etching cream at January 23, 2012 06:03 AMI conceive this site has very good pent written content content .
Posted by: Lee Zumpano at April 10, 2012 02:20 AMActually fascinating concept for me ! Will you post some additional ? coz i want to follow ur twitter or facebook
Posted by: Ellsworth Ravert at April 10, 2012 02:57 PMThats some intresting info I would like to read more about it. computer repair computer repair computer repair it support it support it support computer desktop repair
Posted by: remote computer repair at May 20, 2012 06:17 PMSome really excellent information, Sword lily I noticed this. "What happens is not as important as how you react to what happens." by Thaddeus Golas.
Posted by: best internet forum at February 1, 2013 05:05 AM